{"action":"create","ckan_id":null,"date_created":"Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:50:47 GMT","date_finished":null,"harvest_job_id":"cf9174c3-bffd-42ec-9f28-73fdb9d4cfda","harvest_source_id":"4c62556f-0fa3-402d-90f6-6a46cd80a117","id":"92b3ed7c-42ef-49d0-bc52-c6ddae4a266d","identifier":"https://hazards.fema.gov/filedownload/metadata/R10/2065061-AcquireBaseMap.xml","parent_identifier":null,"source_hash":"6c28abea6a0b89fb4cde0578a5f11b78daa39b58f19aace5187fac5ee6d2a9f7","source_raw":"\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Flood County GIS Department\r\n 20250430\r\n FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, Lane COUNTY, USA\r\n\tVersion 2.8.5.6\r\n FGDC-Framework-Basemap\r\n \r\n Washington, DC\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n https://hazards.fema.gov\r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n Unknown\r\n FEMA CASE 20-10-0010S\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Basemap datasets comprise five of the seven FGDC themes of geospatial data that are used by most GIS applications (Note: the framework themes of orthoimagery and elevation are packaged in separate NFIP Metadata Profiles): cadastral, geodetic control, governmental unit, transportation, and hydrography (water areas and lines). These data include an encoding of the geographic extent of the features and a minimal number of attributes needed to identify and describe the features. (Source: Circular A16)\r\n The Basemap datasets reflect the reference features (i.e., roads, streets, hydrographic features, political jurisdiction boundaries) needed by users to locate properties on FIRMs. (Source: Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping)\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20250430\r\n \r\n \r\n MIP Submission Date\r\n \r\n \r\n In work\r\n Unknown\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n -124.3\r\n -121.7\r\n 44.4\r\n 43.3\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n ISO 19115 Topic Category\r\n transportation\r\n boundaries\r\n inlandWaters\r\n \r\n \r\n FEMA NFIP Topic Category\r\n Basemap\r\n \r\n \r\n None\r\n REGION \r\n STATE \r\n COUNTY \r\n COUNTY-FIPS \r\n FEMA-CID 41039C\r\n COMMUNITY COBURG, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY COTTAGE GROVE, CITY OF\r\n HYDROLOGIC UNIT 17100206\r\n COMMUNITY CRESWELL, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY DUNES CITY, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY EUGENE, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY FLORENCE, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY JUNCTION CITY, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF COBURG URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF CRESWELL URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF DUNES CITY URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF EUGENE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF FLORENCE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF JUNCTION CITY URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF LOWELL URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF OAKRIDGE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF SPRINGFIELD URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF VENETA URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF WESTFIR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY\r\n COMMUNITY LANE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS\r\n COMMUNITY LOWELL, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY OAKRIDGE, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY VENETA, CITY OF\r\n COMMUNITY WESTFIR, CITY OF\r\n FEMA-CID 410119\r\n FEMA-CID 410120\r\n FEMA-CID 410121\r\n FEMA-CID 410262\r\n FEMA-CID 410122\r\n FEMA-CID 410123\r\n FEMA-CID 410124\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 415591\r\n FEMA-CID 410125\r\n FEMA-CID 410126\r\n FEMA-CID 415592\r\n FEMA-CID 410128\r\n FEMA-CID 410289\r\n \r\n \r\n None\r\n Acknowledgement of FEMA would be appreciated in products derived from these data. These digital data are produced for the purposes of updating/creating a FIRM Database and/or Flood Risk Products.\r\n Original data development environment may vary. Finishing of the data is done using Esri's ArcGIS software. The submitted geodatabase was created using ArcGIS version 10.5.\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n The FIRM Database consists of vector files and associated attributes produced in conjunction with the hardcopy FEMA FIRM. Attribute accuracy was tested by manual comparison of source graphics with hardcopy plots and a symbolized display on an interactive computer graphic system. \r\nIndependent quality control testing of the FIRM Database was also performed.\r\n \r\n Polygons intersecting the neatline are closed along the border. Segments making up the outer and inner boundaries of a polygon tie end-to-end to completely enclose the area. Line segments are a set of sequentially numbered coordinate pairs. No duplicate features exist nor duplicate points in a data string. Intersecting lines are separated into individual line segments at the point of intersection. Point data are represented by two sets of coordinate pairs, each with the same coordinate values. Tests for logical consistency are performed by FIRM topology verification software.\r\n The Basemap datasets represent all the features utilized during the study mapping process to spatially position the FIRM information and highlight the specific prioritization process laid out in the Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping in their selection for use.\r\n\r\nTransportation features were extracted from the U.S. Census Bureau TIGER files. City and county recreation areas and parks were excluded from the political boundaries provided by the Flood County GIS Department for creation of S_Pol_Ar. \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n The NSSDA is used to report the horizontal accuracy of the base map data used by FEMA to produce a FIRM. The NSSDA uses radial accuracy (Accuracyr) to report the radius of a circle of uncertainty, such that the true or theoretical location of a point falls within that circle 95 percent of the time. (Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping.)\r\n \r\n 11.5824\r\n The minimum horizontal positional accuracy for FIRM base map data is the NSSDA radial accuracy of 38 feet. Data that meet higher accuracy standards are also acceptable. Accuracy of 38 feet is the same as radial root mean square error (RMSEr) of 22 feet. (Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping.)\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Lidar Consortium; Watershed Sciences Inc.\r\n 20090527\r\n 2008 North Coast Lidar Survey (DOGAMI)\r\n \r\n \r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20090527\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE01\r\n 2008 lidar used in study\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Lidar Consortium; Watershed Sciences Inc.\r\n 20091217\r\n 2009 North Coast Lidar Survey (DOGAMI)\r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20091217\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE02\r\n 2009 lidar used in study\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Lidar Consortium; Watershed Sciences Inc.\r\n 20120217\r\n 2012 Central Coast Lidar Survey (DOGAMI)\r\n \r\n \r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20120217\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE03\r\n 2012 lidar used in study\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Lidar Consortium; Watershed Sciences Inc.\r\n 20131230\r\n 2013 Lane County Lidar Survey (DOGAMI)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20131230\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE04\r\n 2013 lidar used in study\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n National Geodetic Survey\r\n 20140527\r\n Vertcon Vertical Datum Conversion Tool\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Silver Spring, Maryland\r\n National Geodetic Survey\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140527\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE05\r\n Datum conversion\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USGS\r\n 20140101\r\n National Hydrographic Dataset\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Denver, Colorado\r\n United States Geological Survey\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE06\r\n USGS NHD stream centerlines and waterbodies used in areas without lidar derived water features \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n 20130722\r\n Public Land Survey System\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Lane County, Oregon\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20130722\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE07\r\n PLSS for Lane County\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n 20131212\r\n Surface Jurisdiction/Land Ownership\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20131212\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE08\r\n Political boundaries for Lane County\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20140415\r\n Roads Digitized From 1M Resolution Lidar Collected From 2008-2013\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140415\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE09\r\n Roads digitized from lidar using county roads as name guide\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Lane County, Oregon\r\n 20131211\r\n Lane County Culverts\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Eugene, Oregon\r\n Lane County, Oregon\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20131211\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE10\r\n Culvert locations in Lane County\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n NOAA\r\n 20140101\r\n NOAA Tides and Currents\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE1005\r\n Tide gages used in Lane County detailed coastal analysis\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n NOAA\r\n 20140101\r\n NOAA National Data Buoy Center\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE1006\r\n Buoys used in Lane County detailed coastal analysis\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Lane County, Oregon\r\n 20131216\r\n Lane County Roads\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Eugene, Oregon\r\n Lane County, Oregon\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20131216\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE11\r\n Roads from Lane County\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20140415\r\n Stream Network And Waterbodies Digitized From 1M Resolution Lidar Collected From 2008-2012\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140415\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE12\r\n Water features digitized by DOGAMI using lidar\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20140415\r\n Structures Digitized From 1M Resolution Lidar Collected From 2008-2013\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20140415\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE13\r\n Dams, bridges and culverts digitized from lidar for Lane County\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Department of Transportation\r\n 20150101\r\n Oregon City Limits\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Salem, Oregon\r\n Oregon Department of Transportation\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20150101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE14\r\n Oregon city limits\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Department of Land Conservation And Development\r\n 20150101\r\n Oregon Urban Growth Boundaries\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Salem, Oregon\r\n Oregon Department of Land Conservation And Development\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20150101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE15\r\n Urban Growth Boundaries\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n United State Department of Agriculture\r\n 20200912\r\n USDA FPAC BC Digital Ortho Mosaic\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Salt Lake City, UT\r\n United State Department of Agriculture\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Imagery File\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20200912\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication date\r\n \r\n BASE16\r\n Digital Ortho Mosaic Referenced in S_Base_Index\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20250430\r\n Basemap Task\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20250430\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication date\r\n \r\n BASE17\r\n Political Boundaries\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 19990602\r\n Effective Base Data, Lane County, Oregon (1999 and 2020 FIRM panels)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990602\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE2\r\n Location and attribute information for transportation line features\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\r\n 20210112\r\n Lane County Transportation Data\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20250121\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE21\r\n Transportation Layer. Roads and Railroads\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n State of Oregon\r\n 20230727\r\n PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n State of Oregon\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20230727\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication date\r\n \r\n BASE22\r\n PLSS\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n State of Oregon\r\n 20240610\r\n City Political Boundries\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n State of Oregon\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20240610\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication date\r\n \r\n BASE23\r\n City Political Boundries\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n 20240801\r\n County Boundary\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20240801\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication date\r\n \r\n BASE24\r\n County Boundary\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Oregon Department of Land Conservation And Development\r\n 20231101\r\n Oregon Urban Growth Boundaries\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Salem, Oregon\r\n Oregon Department of Land Conservation And Development\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20231101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE26\r\n Urban Growth Boundaries\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n 20100101\r\n Public Land Survey System\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Bureau of Land Management\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20100101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n BASE25\r\n Location and attribute information for PLSS areas\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 19990602\r\n Data from Flood Insurance Rate Maps, Lane County, Oregon (1999 and 2020 FIS reports)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990602\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n FIRM01\r\n Effective Data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 19990602\r\n Flood Insurance Rate Maps, Lane County, Oregon\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990602\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n FIRM1\r\n s_fld_haz_ar, s_fld_haz_ln, s_bfe, s_datum_conv_pt, s_firm_pan, s_gen_struct, s_pol_ar, s_profil_basln, s_stn_start, s_xs\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 19990602\r\n Flood Insurance Study, Lane County, Oregon\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990602\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n FIS1\r\n s_bfe\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20060103\r\n LOMR Case Number 05-10-A519P (Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20060103\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC10\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 05-10-A519P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20080930\r\n LOMR Case Number 7-10-0717P (City of Coburg and Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20080930\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC11\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 07-10-0717P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20070727\r\n LOMR Case Number 07-10-0290P (Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20070727\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC12\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 07-10-0290P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20090722\r\n LOMR Case Number 09-10-0819P (Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20090722\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC13\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 09-10-0819P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20171017\r\n LOMR Case Number 16-10-1640P (Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20171017\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC14\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 16-10-1640P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20210625\r\n LOMR Case Number 20-10-0681P (City of Cottage Grove, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20210625\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC16\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 20-10-0681P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20210818\r\n LOMR Case Number 20-10-1089P (Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20210818\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC17\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 20-10-1089P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20170731\r\n LOMR Case Number 17-10-0426P (City of Eugene, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20170731\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC21\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 17-10-0426P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20020425\r\n LOMR Case Number 02-10-216P (City of Eugene and Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20020425\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC8\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 02-10-216P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 20020425\r\n LOMR Case Number 02-10-085P (City of Eugene and Lane County, Oregon)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20020425\r\n \r\n \r\n Effective Date\r\n \r\n LOMC9\r\n Spatial and attribute information for LOMR Case Number 02-10-085P\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Columbia Basin Inter-Agency Committee, Hydrology Subcommittee\r\n 19630601\r\n River Mile Index, Willamette River and Tributaries, Columbia River Basin, Oregon\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n Columbia Basin Inter-Agency Committee, Hydrology Subcommittee\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19630601\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF10\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n D.L. Kriebel and R.G. Dean\r\n 19930301\r\n Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, “Convolution method for time-dependent beach-profile response,” Volume 119, Issue 2\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Reston, Virginia\r\n American Society of Civil Engineers\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19930401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF11\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Lacoss and Associates\r\n 88880808\r\n Emerald Valley Sports Center Topographic Mapping, 1:2,400 Contour Interval 2 feet\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Eugene, Oregon\r\n Lacoss and Associates\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 88880808\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF12\r\n Reference 35\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n H.F. Stockdon, R.A. Holman, and A.H. Sellenger, Jr.\r\n 20240506\r\n Coastal Engineering, “Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup,” Volume 53, Issue 7\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Hackensack, New Jersey\r\n World Scientific\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20060401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF13\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USACE\r\n 19721201\r\n Flood Plain Information, Willamette River, Harrisburg, Oregon\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Harrisburg, Oregon\r\n U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineer, Portland District\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19721201\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF14\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USACE\r\n 19840101\r\n Topographic Map, Scale 1:6,000, Contour Interval 5 feet., Long Tom River\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Veneta, Oregon\r\n U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineer\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19840101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF15\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USDA\r\n 19740501\r\n Flood Plain Reference Report, Siuslaw River, Lane County, Oregon\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19740301\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF16\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USGS\r\n 19580101\r\n Water-Supply Paper 1318. Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States through September 1950, Part 14\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19580101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF17\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USGS\r\n 19630101\r\n Water-Supply Paper 1738. Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States, October 1950 to September 1960, Part 14\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19630101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF18\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USGS\r\n 19750101\r\n 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Maps, 15-Minute Series Topographic Maps\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Oregon\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19750101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF19\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USGS\r\n 19770101\r\n Water Resources Data for Oregon, Part 1, Surface Water Records\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19770101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF20\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n J.W. van der Meer\r\n 20240502\r\n Technical report: wave run-up and overtopping at dikes\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Delft, Netherlands\r\n Technical Advisory Committee on Flood Defense, The Netherlands\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20020401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF21\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n City of Veneta\r\n 19771201\r\n Veneta Comprehensive Plan\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Veneta, Oregon\r\n City of Veneta\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19771201\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF22\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n N.Booij, R.C.Ris, and L.H.Holthuijsen\r\n 19990401\r\n Journal of Geophysical Research, “A third-generation wave model for coastal regions, part 1: model description and validation,” Volume 104, Number C4\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Malden, Massachusetts\r\n American Geophysical Union\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF25\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n J.D. Boon\r\n 20041001\r\n “Secrets of the tide: tide and tidal current analysis and applications, storms surges and sea level trends”, CRC Marine Science\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Cambridge, UK\r\n Woodhead Publishing\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20041001\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF26\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n R.M. Cooper\r\n 20050101\r\n U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5116, “Estimation of peak discharges for rural, unregulated streams in Western Oregon”\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20050101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF27\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n R.C. Ris, L.H.Holthuijsen, and N.Booij\r\n 19990401\r\n Journal of Geophysical Research, “A third-generation wave model for coastal regions, part 2: verification,” Volume 104, Number C4\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Malden, Massachusetts\r\n American Geophysical Union\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Hydraulic Model\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF28\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.\r\n 19780401\r\n Topographic Maps, Lane County Flood Insurance Study, P11710.PQ, Scale 1:4,800, Contour Interval 5 feet\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19780401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF5\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.\r\n 19781001\r\n Aerial Photographs, Lane County Flood Insurance Study P11293.B4, Scale 1:12,000\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19781001\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF6\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Chickering-Green Empire, Inc.\r\n 19050526\r\n Topographic Maps, Scale 1:1,200, Contour Intervals 2 and 5 feet\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Florence, Oregon\r\n Chickering-Green Empire, Inc.\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19730101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF7\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n H.G. Chickering, Jr.\r\n 19620801\r\n Topographic Maps, Lane County, Oregon, Scale 1:4,800, Contour Interval 2 feet\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Eugene, Oregon\r\n H.G. Chickering, Jr.\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19620801\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF8\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n H.G. Chickering, Jr.\r\n 19720401\r\n Topographic Maps, City of Cottage Grove, Oregon, Scale 1:600, Contour Interval 2 feet\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Eugene, Oregon\r\n H.G. Chickering, Jr.\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Paper\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19720401\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n REF9\r\n Reference documents\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20151212\r\n DOGAMI Lane Detailed Coastal Analysis Task\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20151212\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY01\r\n Study data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20151212\r\n DOGAMI Lane Approximate Coastal Analysis Task\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20151212\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY02\r\n Study data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20150101\r\n DOGAMI Detailed Redelineation\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20150101\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY03\r\n Study data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n STARR\r\n 20160201\r\n STARR Approximate Riverine Analysis\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20160201\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY04\r\n Water features\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20150801\r\n DOGAMI Approximate Lacustrine Analysis\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20150801\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY05\r\n Study data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20170701\r\n DOGAMI Dfirm Task\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 2500\r\n Hard Disk\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20170701\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY06\r\n Study data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n USGS\r\n 20170518\r\n USGS Stream Gages\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Denver, Colorado\r\n United States Geological Survey\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Web Download\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20170518\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY07\r\n Stream Gages\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n 19990602\r\n Data from Effective Study, Lane County, Oregon (1999 and 2020 FIS reports and FIRM panels)\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Online\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 19990602\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY1\r\n Effective Data\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Baker\r\n 20101001\r\n Redelineation and digital lifts of flooding sources in Lane Co, OR\r\n vector digital data\r\n \r\n Washington, D.C.\r\n Michael Baker Jr., Inc.\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n Hydraulic Model\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20101001\r\n \r\n \r\n Publication Date\r\n \r\n STUDY9\r\n S_Fld_Haz_Ar, S_BFE, S_Profil_Basln\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n DOGAMI\r\n 20090919\r\n LiDAR, Lane County Oregon, 2008\r\n raster digital data\r\n \r\n Portland, Oregon\r\n DOGAMI (Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries)\r\n \r\n Effective FIS and FIRM for , \r\n \r\n \r\n 24000\r\n LiDAR\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n 20080101\r\n \r\n \r\n Aquired Date\r\n \r\n TOPO1\r\n Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from LiDAR\r\n \r\n \r\n All Flood Risk Projects that will result in a digital FIRM require a digital base map that reflects reference features (i.e., roads, streets, hydrographic features, political jurisdiction boundaries) needed by users to locate properties on FIRMs. During the Discovery phase, the base map sources are identified and obtained for use by FEMA for FIRM production. Early coordination with all communities affected by a Flood Risk Project is an important part of the Discovery process described in FEMA's Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping. All acquired base map data are listed in the Discovery Report. These data and any outstanding data requirements are discussed with the project stakeholders during the Discovery Meeting.\r\n 20250430\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Universal Transverse Mercator\r\n \r\n 11\r\n \r\n 0.9996\r\n -117.0\r\n 0.0\r\n 500000\r\n 0.0\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n coordinate pair\r\n \r\n 0.000172\r\n 0.000172\r\n \r\n meters\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n North American Datum of 1983\r\n Geodetic Reference System 80\r\n 6378137\r\n 298.25\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n S_PLSS_Ar\r\n Location and attributes of sections, townships and ranges shown on the FIRM.\r\n FEMA FIRM Database Technical Reference (available at https://www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and-mapping and on the FEMA Risk MAP Knowledge Sharing Site).\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n S_Pol_Ar\r\n Location and attributes for political jurisdictions shown on the FIRM.\r\n FEMA FIRM Database Technical Reference (available at https://www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and-mapping and on the FEMA Risk MAP Knowledge Sharing Site).\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n S_Trnsport_Ln\r\n Location and attributes for roads, railroads and other transportation features shown on the FIRM.\r\n FEMA FIRM Database Technical Reference (available at https://www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and-mapping and on the FEMA Risk MAP Knowledge Sharing Site).\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n S_Wtr_Ar\r\n Location and attributes for hydrography features shown on the FIRM.\r\n FEMA FIRM Database Technical Reference (available at https://www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and-mapping and on the FEMA Risk MAP Knowledge Sharing Site).\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n S_Wtr_Ln\r\n Location and attributes for hydrography features shown on the FIRM.\r\n FEMA FIRM Database Technical Reference (available at https://www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and-mapping and on the FEMA Risk MAP Knowledge Sharing Site).\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n The Basemap submission is made up of several data themes containing both spatial and attribute information. These data together represent the current basemap layers for the subject area as identified by FEMA.\r\n FEMA's FIRM Database Technical Reference contains a detailed description of the data themes and references to other relevant information.\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n FEMA, Mapping Information Platform\r\n \r\n \r\n mailing\r\n
500 C Street, S.W.
\r\n Washington\r\n District of Columbia\r\n 20472\r\n USA\r\n \r\n 1-877-336-2627\r\n fema-riskmap-ithelp@fema.dhs.gov\r\n \r\n \r\n No warranty expressed or implied is made by FEMA regarding the utility of the data on any other system nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Esri Shapefile\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n https://hazards.fema.gov\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Contact Distributor\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n 20250430\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n MIPHelp\r\n Federal Emergency Management Agency\r\n \r\n \r\n mailing\r\n
500 C Street, S.W.
\r\n Washington\r\n District of Columbia\r\n 20472\r\n USA\r\n \r\n 1-877-336-2627\r\n fema-riskmap-ithelp@fema.dhs.gov\r\n \r\n \r\n FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata\r\n FGDC-STD-001-1998\r\n \r\n https://hazards.fema.gov\r\n https://www.epsg.org\r\n FEMA NFIP Metadata Content and Format Standard\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n","source_transform":null,"status":"error"}